Controversy continues over the apology that Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an offered yesterday at Taipei’s 228 Incident memorial event. Critics say his apology fell short, as he focused on his identity as city mayor and not as the great-grandson of authoritarian ruler Chiang Kai-shek. They also say he only apologized for the trigger of the massacre, and not for the brutal crackdown that followed. Amid the controversy, one KMT councilor says that Taipei should just not hold memorial events for the victims of the massacre. Her comments have sparked outrage from DPP councilors and from associations fighting for transitional justice.
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an met with clamor from reporters upon arriving at a meeting room on Wednesday morning. One day before at Taipei’s 228 Incident memorial event, he had given a speech that did not go down well with critics.
Chiang Wan-an (Feb. 28)
Taipei mayor
As the mayor of Taipei, I would like to express my most sincere apology for the crackdown on cigarette sales near the Tianma Teahouse in Taipei’s Dadaocheng neighborhood 76 years ago, an incident that led to the 228 massacre, the pain of which has transcended history.
Yang Chen-lung
National 228 Memorial Museum
It was perfunctory, and he missed the main point. Did he mean to say that if there had been no crackdown on cigarette sales it would’ve been fine? Because that’s not the case, a 228 Incident would’ve broken out regardless. He’s playing down the matter, and it’s not in good faith.
The head of the National 228 Memorial Museum says the cigarette crackdown was just the tipping point. He says the real discontent came from the authoritarian KMT government’s suppression of Taiwanese people
Yang Chen-lung
National 228 Memorial Museum
The surname Chiang comes with certain political advantages, but it should also come with some responsibilities. I do not feel he was sincere.
Tsai Shi-ping
Taipei Department of Cultural Affairs
The National 228 Memorial Museum is a central government entity. We respect their reading of the situation. We can’t simply say that what Mayor Chiang said was bad or wrong because of his unique status. The incident is something all leaders should learn a lesson from.
Several protesters, some more disruptive than others, made their voice heard at the memorial event. KMT Taipei City Councilor Chung Pei-chun says she will bring up a proposal to stop holding the event.
Chung Pei-chun
KMT Taipei City councilor
As long as these troublemakers take the day to amplify their own voices, the 228 Peace Memorial Day will remain a turbid day, as there is no way for anyone to find out what really happened. So what’s the point of making it a memorial holiday?
Chen Yi-chun
DPP lawmaker
If Taipei stops holding its memorial event for the 228 Incident, the only thing that will happen is the people of Taiwan will think that the KMT and Chiang Wan-an do not want to face up to what really happened. What happened to transitional justice?
Liao Chi-pin
Memorial Foundation of 228
I understand the motive, but I think there is no need to get so nervous to the point of canceling it altogether. But it doesn’t matter. If department head Tsai Shih-ping really considers the advice from that councilor and Taipei doesn’t hold a memorial next year, we’ll hold it. We’ll do our own event.
Chung’s proposal has met outcry from DPP councilors, and even the honorary chair of the Memorial Foundation of 228. Some say that calling off the city’s event would only give rise to more controversy, and not be conducive to healing the scars of the massacre.
台北市長蔣萬安週二在二二八紀念活動致詞時,以台北市長身分,為76年前天馬茶房附近發生的緝菸事件,最終導致全台二二八事件道歉。但二二八國家紀念館發文打臉,強調主因是當時的威權體制,壓榨百姓,讓全台灣人不滿,查緝私菸只是導火線。館長批評蔣萬安過度窄化原因,更感受不到任何誠意。
蔣萬安一早主持市政會議,聽到敏感問題,立刻快閃。週二他在二二八紀念活動上的道歉致詞,惹出爭議。
[[台北市長 蔣萬安(2.28)]]
身為台北市長,深深為76年前發生在台北市大稻埕天馬茶房附近的緝菸事件,進而導致全台228事件的歷史傷痛,致上誠摯的歉意。
[[二二八國家紀念館館長 楊振隆]]
“這太呼嚨了、把它窄化了,這樣不緝私菸就沒有事了嗎?不是,還是會發生後面的二二八事件。太小看這件事情了,而且也不夠公道。”
二二八國家紀念館館長表示,天馬茶房緝菸事件只是導火線,真正原因是當時的國民黨政府威權體制、壓榨百姓,才會讓全台灣人不滿。
[[二二八國家紀念館館長 楊振隆]]
“姓蔣得來的政治利益,同樣也要承擔,因為姓蔣而得來的一些責任。我完全感受不到他的誠意。”
[[台北市文化局長 蔡詩萍]]
“國家紀念館站在中央的層級,他們要怎麼詮釋,我覺得我們都尊重。不能因為蔣市長的身分獨特,我們就覺得他講這個話不對或不行,因為所有執政者都應該引以為戒。”
週二的活動,現場抗議行動不斷,國民黨議員鍾沛君打算提案,市府應該停辦二二八紀念活動。
[[台北市議員(國) 鍾沛君]]
只要這些鬧事者一日想要從中謀取個人聲量,那麼二二八在台灣就永遠都是混濁、沒有辦法澄清的一天那麼放假紀念又有什麼用途呢
[[台北市議員(民) 陳怡君]]
“停辦二二八追思會的下場,只會讓台灣人民覺得,國民黨以及蔣萬安不願意去面對二二八的真相,何論轉型正義呢?”
[[二二八基金會名譽理事長 廖繼斌]]
“動機我可以理解啦,但是我想不必這麼緊張就取消,那沒有關係,如果蔡詩萍局長採納議員的建議,明年北市府不辦,那我們辦,我們自己辦。”
不只綠營議員反彈,就連二二八基金會也認為不妥,將行之有年的紀念活動喊卡的想法,無法弭平傷痕,反而讓爭議更加發酵擴大。
Related News