
Premier Cho Jung-tai has countersigned the KMT’s version of a much-debated bill regarding the development of Taiwan’s drone industry. But though their law is now promulgated, opposition lawmakers from the KMT and TPP are not happy about the process. They are criticizing the premier for potentially using the countersignature system to block bills he doesn’t support. Let’s hear more.
Cho Jung-tai
Premier
I countersigned the bill within the legally prescribed period. The only rationale for countersigning bills is that they must not violate the Constitution or the law, undermine the separation of powers or undermine fiscal discipline. We shouldn’t put industry, or national defense and security in the back burner. We insist on two principles. The government’s power over the budget should not be undermined by a breach of the separation of powers. And national secrets must be properly protected.
Lee Yen-hsiu
Lawmaker (KMT)
Countersignatures are not a Constitutional pick-and-mix right for the premier. It’s not a power to be wielded unconstitutionally.
Hung Yu-shiang
Lawmaker (TPP)
The Executive Yuan shouldn’t have double standards. They can’t choose to countersign only the bills they want to approve.
Xavier Chang
Executive Yuan Secretary-General
National security should not be sacrificed for political welfare. And neither should industrial development. We’ve decided to let go of the dispute and put our country first. National defense and security cannot wait.
The bill is called the Act on Strengthening Defense Autonomy and Developing the Unmanned Vehicles Industry. It allocates NT$240 billion over six years, and requires the Executive to establish a strategic committee on the matter. This committee would be formed by experts recommended by the different political parties, and the meetings would be required to be made public online. This latest part has been slammed by the DPP, which says that making such information public would be welcoming the enemy with a red carpet. Premier Cho says that, though the Executive Yuan is disappointed with the bill, it is not unconstitutional, adding that any shortcomings can be made up for during its implementation.
For more Taiwan news, tune in:
Mon to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152
Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53
#drone #uav #defense #taiwan #politics
行政院宣布,副署國民黨版本無人機條例,但提出兩大堅持,包括堅守預算權、還有國家機密必須受到最嚴格保護,不過藍白大作文章,質疑政院兩套標準,想要的法案就副署,不想要的就不副署,行政院秘書長張惇涵回擊,國家安全不應該成為政治攻防代價,決定把爭議留在身後,國家最優先。
[[行政院長 卓榮泰]]
“我們已經在這個條例送過來的法定期間內,予以副署,只有一個標準,一個原則,就是不能違憲、違法,也不能破壞權力分立,不能破壞財政紀律。產業不能等,國防安全也不能等,行政院堅持兩個原則,第一個就是預算權不容被權力分立所破壞,第二個就是國家的機密一定要得到完善的保護”
[[立委(國) 李彥秀]]
"副署權不是行政院長的憲政自助餐,更不是違憲亂政的尚方寶劍"
[[立委(民眾) 洪毓祥]]
“行政院你不能夠有兩套的標準,你想要的法案,你就選擇性的通過,副署執行”
[[行政院秘書長 張惇涵]]
“國家安全不應該成為政治攻防代價,產業發展不能成為政治攻防的犧牲品,我們決定把爭議留在身後,把國家放在最優先,國防安全不能等”
藍營版無人載具條例,編列6年2400億預算,但也要求行政院新設"戰略特別委員會",由各黨團推薦學者專家參加,而且會議內容都要上網公開,曾被綠營質疑,引清兵入關,卓榮泰解釋,審視在野黨版本後,雖然對內容感到遺憾,但政院認為沒有違憲,法律面的不足,將從執行面補強。
更多新聞內容,請鎖定:
民視台灣台(152頻道)週一至週五晚上9:30
民視新聞台(53頻道)週二至週六凌晨1:00
Related News