
The Taipei Metro has announced plans to build a pedestrian bridge over Civic Boulevard near Taipei Main Station, to make the area more walkable. The proposal has gotten mixed reactions. Some pedestrians say a walkway would save them time and hassle. But critics raise concerns about the impact on motorists and local businesses.
Even after rush hour, Civic Boulevard near Taipei Main Station is still busy with traffic. Along the thoroughfare, signs warn of fines for jaywalking. To cross the street, pedestrians have two options: taking an underpass connecting to the Zhongshan Metro Mall, or walking 200 meters to the nearest zebra crossing.
Member of public
The metro mall and MRT corridors are all connected, so you can lose your way quite easily.
Member of public
I have tried walking around, but it’s a hassle. It takes an extra 5 to 10 minutes.
Member of public
I hadn’t come for some time, so I didn’t quite know how to get around. If you take the wrong exit you have to go back in. It’s annoying.
According to Taipei Metro, out-of-towners often get lost in the underground mall, and must spend a long time deciphering maps or turning to their phones for guidance. After years of deliberation, the transport company decided to build a raised walkway connecting Taipei Bus Station with Kuo-Kuang Motor Transport’s bus terminal. With a price tag of NT$400 million, the project aims to save pedestrians a headache.
Voice of Hsu Chin-chih
Taiwan Institute of Landscape Architects
It would have to be at least 4.6 meters tall, so that vehicles can pass through below. It has to be high, but we can’t move the overpass above it, so that gives very little clearance to pedestrians on the walkway. It’d be quite uncomfortable. If you are driving at ground level on Civic Boulevard, the bridge would form a divider that cuts the skyline in half.
Although some applaud the initiative, experts say it would obstruct views for motorists, and run counter to current trends in urban design. Meanwhile, a city council member questions the need for a raised walkway.
Chen Yi-chun
DPP Taipei councilor
This would be putting the cart before the horse. They would be doing it without consulting anyone. If they build the walkway, then nobody would pass by the shops in the metro mall, which would deliver a blow to their business. Also, nowadays, many cities are taking down their pedestrian bridges. Why is building a bridge the solution to lost tourists?
Voice of Ling Chi-yao
Taipei Metro customer service center
Tourists don’t know how to navigate the underground passages. They often have to come up to ground level to find their way around. The sky bridge would benefit tourists who come.
The metro company said the bridge was part of the Western District Gateway Project and was still under review by the urban planning committee, which will accept feedback from all stakeholders.
台北市近年逐漸淘汰天橋,北捷卻規劃在國光客運台北站旁的市民大道上方,興建造價四億的造景天橋,來往台北轉運站,減少乘客迷路,也節省通行時間。但議員質疑,已有地下街,再花錢造橋,恐有疊床架屋疑慮,還可能讓地下街人潮流失,影響生意,也有專家擔心對景觀與開車視線造成阻礙。
來到台北車站的市民大道,儘管過了上班尖峰時間,車流量仍不小,擔心民眾違規穿越,還特別設了告示牌,行人如果想到對向,只能走捷運地下街或繞到兩百公尺遠的斑馬線!
[[民眾]]
“地下街有些跟捷運路線混在一起,就很容易迷路。”
[[民眾]]
“我有試著從這邊走過去,確實很困難,至少要5到10分鐘。”
[[民眾]]
“太多年沒有上來了,方向會有一點錯亂,走錯出口又要往回走,很麻煩。”
許多從外地民眾和觀光客,經常在地下通道迷了路,或是花時間看地圖、滑手機,尋找路徑。北捷評估多年之後決定,在台北轉運和國光客運台北站,斥資四億打造一座造景天橋,節省民眾的通行時間!
[[聲源:中華民國景觀學會執行長 許晉誌]]
“高度要4.6米,才能夠提供一般車輛通行,所以天橋又要高,上面又沒辦法動,所以走在天橋上面會變得很侷促,很不舒服,開車在市民大道上,天橋會形成一個阻隔,它會把天際線切掉一半。”
多半民眾都覺得美意很不錯,但專家擔心會影響到駕駛或騎士的景觀視覺,更諷刺現今蓋天橋是反潮流。議員也質疑,北捷作法根本疊床架屋!
[[台北市議員(民) 陳怡君]]
“這根本就是本末倒置且便宜行事,設置天橋之後,地下街沒有人逛,店家的生意也會因此受到影響,且很多地方都在拆天橋了,怎麼會為了遊客迷路的問題來蓋天橋呢?”
[[聲源:北捷客服中心主任 凌啟堯]]
“外地的旅客,對於地下動線不熟,常常要先到路面來尋找路徑,我們未來的空廊設置之後,就可以服務外地的旅客。”
捷運公司強調,蓋景觀天橋是配合市府的西區門戶計畫,目前已由都市審計會議審查,會再聽取各方意見。
Related News