Logo

Music disappearing from public spaces amid fear of copyright disputes

Music disappearing from public spaces amid fear of copyright disputes

2024-03-03

Just over 20 years ago, Taiwan passed an amendment to the Copyright Act in a bid to help artists and musical creators obtain royalties from their works. At the time, it was hailed as a milestone that would protect musicians and promote cultural development. But over the years, it’s become clear that the act has side effects harmful to Taiwan’s music scene. Overzealous copyright holders have found ways to abuse the system and collect extortionate licensing fees from small businesses and individuals. Those who do try to follow the law find themselves grappling with paperwork and hefty fees. All in all, critics say the act has forced music out of Taiwan’s public spaces. Our Sunday special report.

Colorful lights and an enticing beat get dancers on the floor. The dance hall at this club is where people can let go of their stress, by singing to their heart’s content. But the once carefree gatherings have changed over the past decade. Every now and then, a stranger will burst in and accuse the revelers of copyright infringement.

Mr. Chen
Singing club head
One time they came in saying that their company had a copyright on the music and that we hadn’t obtained a license. They asked us what we would do about it. So I told them that from that we would purchase a license from them. We also paid them NT$60,000 in compensation for the song that we were playing.

It may seem that music can be listened to and played freely, but that is not the case. In the year 2000, an amendment to the Copyright Act gave music creators, record labels and copyright management groups the right to collect licensing fees. The revision was aimed at protecting the intellectual property of creators. But it’s inadvertently caused big headaches for music lovers.

Ms. Lin
Former karaoke operator
They came in and asked me to lend them the book with the list of songs. I handed it over. Then, they said, “Oh, this song.” I asked them what was wrong with the song. At the time, they said it was nothing. Later, they called other people over and they asked to see the owner. Only then did they say that we were not allowed to use the song, and that we had to pay a fine.

Mr. Chen
Singing club head
A similar thing happened to a seafood restaurant near here. Reps from a copyright company went to the restaurant and requested a song. I remember it perfectly, the title was “Xiao Wei”. They owned the rights to the song, so the company took the restaurant to court and demanded a settlement of NT$600,000.

A fine of NT$600,000 could bring a small business to an end. The copyright rules have also affected the livelihoods of singing teachers.

Mr. Huang
Singing teacher
A teacher in this line of work was caught by a copyright owner and had to stop teaching. The fine was more than NT$300,000.

Being unaware of the law does not exempt violators from fines. But some copyright owners have turned to abusing the protections by “fishing” for victims to claim compensation.

Chang Po-wei
Street Arts and Culture Development Association
Street performers singing outside have been targeted before, as well as small businesses like beauty salons or even clothing shops. People show up at the door and say you have to pay to play the music. They’ll say it’s NT$5,000 per month or whatever, and that if you don’t cough up, they’ll sue you and you’ll end up paying thousands of dollars.

Hung Sheng-i
Intellectual Property Office
That kind of fishing strategy you mentioned was very useful early on. To collect evidence for a case, people could just request a copyrighted song, and take a video and photos, so that the violator would have no way to escape.

Such copyright disputes aren’t just limited to individuals and small businesses. Media outlets and online platforms have also been caught up in the storm. In 2022, a variety program called the “Bing Bing Show” was asked to pay NT$60 million in licensing fees.

Users should pay, but just how much is a reasonable fee?

Gary Kuo
Intellectual property lawyer
Songs are actually two kinds of copyrighted works. One is the musical work – that is the composition and lyrics. The other is the sound recording. It’s usually not too difficult to obtain a license for sound recordings, because all the rights are concentrated in a few entities. You can often do it via the record label or the distributor. So platforms and users can reach out to the record label or the distributor to obtain a license and negotiate the relevant fees.

Chang Chung-hsin
Soochow University School of Law
If you want to use other people’s works, you have to ask for permission or obtain a license. That is, you have to pay. But different kinds of uses may incur different kinds of fees. Public broadcasts, public transmissions and public performances are three different kinds of uses. Reproduction is yet another kind of use.

Obtaining licenses for a song and paying the relevant fees can be a complicated process. Several copyright associations have formed in Taiwan, to defend the rights and interests of music creators.

Hung Sheng-i
Intellectual Property Office
There are five such associations in Taiwan. So if you want to get a license to broadcast, transmit and perform the work in public, both for the musical work and the sound recording, you need to discuss the matter with all five associations. Every year, radio and television stations sign blanket license agreements with the associations. If you upload the program to YouTube, you’d have to also obtain reproduction rights. But the associations do not deal with reproduction rights.

Although television and radio stations pay high fees every year, they still sometimes encounter legal troubles. Several programs, including the “Bing Bing Show,” have been forced to shut down over the years due to exorbitant licensing fees.

The variety show “The Golden Age” faced the same fate, as did a popular radio music show hosted by Mickey Huang. Copyright disputes have dealt a big blow to major media outlets, as well as private users.

Mr. Huang
Singing teacher
There are so many fees that it has all become a big burden for music teachers. It creates concerns, making them less willing to take on students. Of all the countries in the world, Taiwan likes singing the most.

Although it’s neither unreasonable nor illegal to ask users to pay for music licenses, complicated application procedures and the risk of pricy disputes have slowly forced music out of public spaces.

Mr. Chen
Singing club head
Huanzhong East Road had a dozen singing parlors in its golden age. There was also lots of places along Huaxun Street, Xinzhong North Road, and Zhongshan East Road. But now almost all of them have shut down, because they can’t pay the licensing fees.

Copyright issues don’t just cause headaches in Taiwan. In the era of online streaming, licensing has become a major legal issue in countries all around the world. In 2018, the U.S. passed the Music Modernization Act. The bill aimed to lower the cost of licensing songs and expand upon the rights of music creators, to benefit both copyright owners and users.

Gary Kuo
Intellectual property lawyer
If you wanted to compile all the music onto one platform, you’d have to obtain licenses one by one from each of the copyright holders. That came with high administrative costs. The Copyright Act of the past wasn’t able to meet those needs, and that’s why the U.S. introduced the new Music Modernization Act. The main effect was that it made the licensing process less difficult and it lowered costs, so that people or platforms that want to use the music can do so fully.

Article 1 of Taiwan’s Copyright Act states that the bill was enacted for the purpose of “promoting the development of national culture.” But the reality is that acquiring licenses to use any song requires engaging in many negotiations and paying multiple fees. Critics say this cumbersome and expensive process is detrimental for cultural development, but the government says it all comes down to market mechanisms. Meanwhile, the number of music programs is on the decline, and music is no longer played at department stores, cafes or public spaces such as train stations. Even street performers are afraid of singing in public.

Chang Po-wei
Street Arts and Culture Development Association
I know a lot of music creators, including people who are just starting out and people creating music online. What they want is for the songs they are writing to be heard everywhere. Imagine if you were strolling around the pedestrian area in Xinyi District, or walking along the Calligraphy Greenway in Taichung, and everything was silent. No music playing. It’s detrimental to the growth of the music industry and the development of urban art in cities.

Taiwan’s Copyright Act has been in effect for more than 20 years now. Though well intentioned, it has given rise to an endless string of licensing disputes. Critics say the bill has driven music away from society.

Chang Po-wei
Street Arts and Culture Development Association
When I was still a student, I often went to the Chunghwa Market in Taipei. I could walk along the street from the first block to the last while hearing the entirety of Chyi Chin’s “Yuanlai de Wo”. On the way back, I could listen to Dave Wong’s “Forget About You / Forget About Me.” Music was our companion during our student days. I hope these copyright associations can think about this. If tomorrow the works by all these artists were to disappear from the streets of Taiwan, would their music continue to be passed down?

As music players shut off and street performers go quiet on the streets, is Taiwan destined to become a society living in silence? Only time will tell.

For more Taiwan news, tune in:
Sun to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152
Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53

音樂 閉嘴?

2024-03-03

過去,電視綜藝節目常會有精彩的歌唱單元,走在街上,也不時會聽到店家播放流行音樂,但現在,流行音樂卻不再那麼容易處處聽到了,主要是因為在2000年著作權法修法之後,只要是音樂公開播放或演唱,都會涉及到著作權問題,必須付費。但繁瑣的授權程序和複雜的版權費率,不只讓很多小店家莫名其妙被告上法院,要求高額和解金,就連像是張惠妹在內的許多知名歌手,都曾因為版權問題,無法在演唱會上唱自己的歌!現行的音樂版權付費機制,合理嗎?對我們的音樂環境又造成了什麼樣的影響呢?

七彩的燈光,優美的旋律,輕盈的舞步,歌友會的小小舞池裡,唱著酸甜苦辣的人生。然而歡樂的聯誼場合卻從十年前開始變了調,總有人不定期會突然找上門,指控播放的音樂,全都涉及版權問題。

[[歌友會負責人 陳先生]]
“有一次他說這是他們音樂公司的版權,我們沒有買他的版權,他問我們要怎麼處理,我們就跟他講,從今以後我們就買你們的版權,至於我們用的這首歌曲,我們再另外支付六萬元補償他。”

原本以為音樂可以自由聆聽、隨興播放,這才知道2000年《著作權法》修法後,音樂創作人、唱片公司與著作權團體,擁有收取版權費用的權利,政府保障音樂創作人的智慧財產權、立意良善,然而實際的情況卻是處處悲歌。

[[前卡拉OK業者 林女士]]
“他一進來就講說,你的歌本借我看一下,我就拿給他看,他說這首歌,我問他這首歌怎麼樣,他先跟我講說沒事,後來通知人來了,就叫我們老闆來,他才講這個不行,這個要罰錢。”

[[歌友會負責人 陳先生]]
“這附近一家海產店也是碰到這個問題,版權公司到海產店輸入這首歌,我印象很深刻,歌名叫《小薇》,結果是他們公司的版權,版權公司告上法院,要求六十萬元的和解金。”

一首歌六十萬和解金,許多「不小心侵權」的餐廳、小吃店,紛紛收攤 倒閉,就連個體戶的教唱老師,也受到波及。

[[歌唱教學老師 黃先生]]
“同業的老師也是被版權仲介所抓,變成沒有辦法教唱,被罰的金額有的都三十萬元起跳。”

侵權是事實,「不知者無罪」亦無法解套,但是老百姓被以「釣魚」的方式,索取高額和解金,難免被人詬病。

[[台灣街頭藝人發展協會理事長 張博威]]
“我們街頭藝人是在外面唱,曾經被鎖定,另外就是小型店家,不管是美容院,甚至服飾店也都有人登門去,你播音樂,付錢喔,一個月五千或多少,沒有我就告你,要你賠幾萬這樣子。”

[[智慧財產局著作權組副組長 洪盛毅]]
“剛剛你講釣魚的方式,早年很有用,我是蒐證人員,我故意把我委託人的歌點出來,然後錄影、拍照,你跑都跑不掉。”

事實上,音樂版權侵權糾紛,不只民眾有感,就連許多媒體、網路平台也有同樣遭遇,2022年歌唱綜藝節目《我愛冰冰Show》,就因為音樂著作重製權的問題,被追討高達六千萬的音樂版權費。

使用者付費理所當然,問題是究竟該付多少錢,才算合理?

[[法律事務所律師 郭建中]]
“歌曲都會分成「音樂著作」的著作權,就是詞曲創作那個部分,另外就是「錄音著作」的著作權,錄音著作的著作權取得授權,相對來講沒有那麼困難,因為它的權利比較集中,通常是透過唱片公司、發行公司,所以這些平台(利用人),可以跟唱片公司、發行公司去談,然後取得授權,費率也是用這樣協商的方式。”

[[東吳大學法律系助理教授 章忠信]]
“利用別人的作品,就必須要取得同意或授權,就表示要付錢的意思,可是不同的利用型態就要付不同的費用,公播、公傳、公演是三種不同的型態,重製是另外一種型態。”

一首歌擁有複雜的計費方式,繁瑣的授權程序,因此「音樂著作權集體管理團體」,簡稱「集管團體」應運而生,協助音樂創作人爭取權益。

[[智慧財產局著作權組副組長 洪盛毅]]
“我們國內的集管團體是有五家,所以你光談三公的權利,音樂著作加錄音著作的話,確實是要找五家。電台、電視台,其實每年都會去跟集管團體,簽立概括授權契約,你把這個節目做好之後,要上傳到YouTube,也是有一個重製權的部分,這個重製權的部分,並不是集管團體所管理的。”

即使電視台、廣播電台,每年支付不少金額,仍會誤踩地雷,跟《我愛冰冰Show》同樣命運,因為鉅額版權費,被迫停播的節目不只一個。

沈文程主持的《黃金年代》、黃子佼的廣播音樂節目都面臨同樣的困境。電視台、廣播電台尚且如此,何況市井小民,音樂版權糾紛從未間斷。

[[歌唱教學老師 黃先生]]
“現在的費用這麼多,對教音樂的老師是一大負擔,就會有顧慮,他(教唱老師)就不敢接。全世界我們台灣是最喜歡唱歌的國家。”

音樂版權成為緊箍咒,不可否認使用者付費合情合理,且依法有據,錯就錯在,錯綜複雜的權利,處處埋下地雷,結果就是台灣的音樂正在逐漸消失中。

[[歌友會負責人 陳先生]]
“光是我們周邊環中東路,全盛時期有十二間歡唱一百,包括華勛街、新中北路附近這幾條中山東路有很多家,但是現在已經收得快差不多了,因為他們無力支付版權費。”

不只台灣,隨著數位串流時代來臨,音樂版權成了世界各國政府頭痛的問題,2018年美國通過「音樂現代化法案」,一方面降低歌曲授權的成本,一方面擴大音樂創作的受益對象,希望創造雙贏局面。

[[法律事務所律師 郭建中]]
“在搜羅這些音樂的過程當中,當然必須一一去取得著作權人的授權,這個授權的過程當中,就是會耗費許多的行政成本,過去現行的《著作權法》已經不能夠滿足這樣的需求,因此就有美國音樂現代化法案的催生,最主要的影響就是讓授權的過程,降低它的困難、降低它的成本,讓想要利用音樂的人與平台能夠盡量的去利用這些音樂。”

台灣的《著作權法》第一條,開宗明義表示「促進國家文化發展 制訂本法」,然而當民眾要使用一首歌,得洽談好幾種授權,支付好幾次費用,一頭牛被剝好幾層皮,國家文化如何發展,政府拿「市場機制」當擋箭牌,導致音樂節目全面萎縮,百貨公司、咖啡館、車站等公共場所不播音樂,就連街頭藝人,也不敢在街上公開唱歌。

[[台灣街頭藝人發展協會理事長 張博威]]
“音樂創作人我認識非常多,素人也好、線上的人都有,其實他們的心態也是很希望他寫的歌到處都聽得到,而不是今天假設走在華納威秀或是走在台中的草悟道,走過去整個靜悄悄都沒有音樂,對整體流行音樂的發展是不利的,對整體國家社會城市藝術的發展是不利的。”

立意良善的音樂版權收費機制,至今實施二十多年,但是音樂版權之亂從未停歇,市井小民怨聲載道。

[[台灣街頭藝人發展協會理事長 張博威]]
“以前我學生時候,常常到台北的中華商場,當時從第一棟走到最後一棟,沿路走可以聽到齊秦的《原來的我》一路播到底,往回走的時候,聽到王傑的《忘了你忘了我》,音樂就好像伴隨著我們那時候學生時代,也希望這個著作權代理的團體,也要想想如果這些藝人,明天全部消失在台灣的街頭,你的音樂還會傳唱嗎?”

尊敬音樂的方式,就是不斷傳唱,如果有一天,台灣的音樂都消失了,寂靜之島,情何以堪。

更多新聞內容,請鎖定:
民視台灣台(152頻道)週日至週五晚上9:30
民視新聞台(53頻道)週二至週六凌晨1:00

Related News

China coast guard vessels enter Kinmen’s restricted waters two days in a row

2024-03-03

First production run of Taiwan’s domestically produced naval corvettes near completion

2024-03-03

Spotlight on Les Clefs d’Or, the world’s most prestigious association of hotel concierge

2024-03-03