
One of Taipei’s mayoral candidates happens to share a name with a popular international sports brand. No, it’s not Chiang Wan-an, but Puma Shen. The coincidence has left people wondering about the legality of wearing clothes from that brand on Election Day. After all, sporting campaign symbols to the voting booth is indeed illegal. Election officials say simply wearing clothes of any given brand is not problematic. Here’s what Puma Shen himself had to say on the matter.
Puma Shen
Taipei mayoral candidate
It’s already an established brand, so in theory, wearing clothes from that brand shouldn’t pose a problem in the eyes of the law. But still, there is a little bit of a gray area depending on how you interpret it. So I would still recommend everyone to just wear regular clothes to the polls. That would avoid any controversy. And consider this, setting aside the legality of it all. Imagine that you happen to walk into a group of people who support the other candidate. They might see things differently. If they look at your clothes and the might say “Hey, you’re campaigning!” or “You’re breaking election laws.” And then an argument might break out. That wouldn’t be ideal at the polls on Election Day.
Chuang Jui-hsiung
DPP legislative caucus
If I usually wear Puma and I change into Adidas clothes or some other brand just for the election, wouldn’t that be bizarre? In any case, the ballot doesn’t say Puma Shen, it says Shen Po-yang.
The Central Election Commission says that only concrete attempts at campaigning are against the law. Examples include canvassing for votes at polling stations or near polling stations, and wearing campaign items such as vests or badges. Such behavior is punishable with fines of up to NT$1 million. So be sure to check your outfit before heading out to vote.
For more Taiwan news, tune in:
Mon to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152
Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53
#cec #puma #pumashen #sports #streetwear
民進黨台北市長候選人沈伯洋,英文名字剛好叫Puma,跟運動品牌相同,掀起網友們討論,投票當天,穿著PUMA衣服、鞋子或帽子,會不會採到助選紅線,中選會強調,不會單憑服飾品牌名稱,就直接認定違規,倒是沈伯洋建議,還是穿著一般,避免引起爭議。
[[台北市長候選人(民) 沈伯洋]]
“因為它本來就是一個品牌的名稱啦,所以呢,穿那個衣服,照理說,以法律上來講,我覺得這個問題不大,但是我覺得它就是有點灰色,都還有解釋的空間,所以我還是比較建議,當天大家就是穿著比較一般啦,比較就是不要引起有爭議,而且大家可以去想像就是說,我們先不要講法律規範的違反,假設今天是遇到對方的支持者,那他可能也不是很認同,然後看到你這個,就認為說,欸你是不是在支持,哦你這樣子是不是有違反選罷法,然後在現場開始吵起來,我覺得這個時候,對於投票當天可能不是那麼的好啦”
[[立法院民進黨團幹事長 莊瑞雄]]
“我穿puma,只因為我要去選舉,所以我要改穿愛迪達或別的品牌,聽起來也好奇怪,其實選票上也沒puma,選票上叫做沈伯洋”
中選會表示,如果過程中無特定選舉動作,並不構成違反選罷法要件。但如果在投開票所內或附近有拉票,或穿著相關競選意圖服飾,比如候選人競選背心等,就可能構成違法助選,可處新臺幣10 萬元以上,100萬元以下罰鍰,提醒民眾還是要特別留意。
更多新聞內容,請鎖定:
民視台灣台(152頻道)週一至週五晚上9:30
民視新聞台(53頻道)週二至週六凌晨1:00
Related News